Ferdinand Christian Baur
See Kümmel 139. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] 
[/caption]
Solutions-to-the-Synoptic-Problem
Christian Wilke
See Baird 305; Kümmel 148–49. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
[caption id=“attachment_2065” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“William Baird”] 
[/caption] [caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Burnett Streeter
See Kümmel 327. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Heinrich Holtzmann
Early Holtzmann 
Late Holtzmann 
See Kümmel 151–55. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Christian Weisse
See Kümmel 149–51. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Karl Lachmann
See Kümmel 146–48. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Johann Eichhorn
Eichhorn does not appear to have named Q as such, but this part of his hypothesis fits what has come to be called Q.
See Kümmel 77–79. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Gotthold Lessing
See Kümmel 76. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Gottlob Storr
See Kümmel 75–76. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Johann Griesbach
See Kümmel 75. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:[caption id=“attachment_2014” align=“alignleft” width=“80” caption=“Werner Kümmel”] [/caption]
Solutions to the Synoptic Problem: Symbol Key
The following symbols, listed alphabetically, are used in the post series that summarizes solutions to the synoptic problem:
-
A, or UrMk – Urmarkus (a proto-Gospel of Mark)
-
Ar – Aramaic
-
frag – fragmentary
-
GosNaz – Gospel of the Nazarenes
-
Heb – Hebrew
-
L – a special, Lukan source
-
Lk – Luke
-
M – a special, Matthean source
-
Mk – Mark
...
Solutions to the Synoptic Problem: Introduction
The ‘synoptic problem’ is a phenomenon that arises because the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke), while they contain so much similar material, do not always report the same material in the same way. Various solutions for the synoptic problem that have been proposed—so many that their nuances can be difficult to remember. This post series will attempt to compose a set of diagrams based on the summaries of these solutions that Kümmel, New Testament ( affiliate disclosure), provides.