The folks at the Bulletin for Biblical Research have very kindly agreed to publish a revised version of my presentation from the November, 2009 meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society: âRewriting Prophets in the Corinthian Correspondence: A Window on Paulâs Hermeneutic.â To provide just a bit fuller picture of the essayâs argument:
In the broadest sense of the phrase, any use of Jewish scripture by a later author(s) could be understood to constitute a form of ârewritten Bibleâ. The phrase ârewritten Bibleâ has, however, come to have a technical meaning whereby it designates a certain body of ancient, Jewish literature. The precise shape of this body of literature continues to be debated, but even with consensus on this specific point as far away as it is, ârewritten Bibleâ can contribute valuable information to the study of Paulâs use of scripture. In particular, ârewritten Bibleâ provides a useful foil for the study of Paulâs citations in 1 Cor 1:31 and 2 Cor 10:17 and the hermeneutical paradigm upon which these citationsâ validity implicitly rests. In this case, Paulâs connections with ârewritten Bibleâ literature especially help suggest the constitutive, hermeneutical role that Jesus played as Paul interpreted scripture for the Corinthian church within the broader context of some of the hermeneutical traditions of his near contemporaries.
...