Daily Gleanings: Faith-Allegiance (3 September 2019)
Daily Gleanings about Matthew Bates’s “Gospel Allegiance,” which follows up on the thesis of “Salvation by Allegiance Alone.”
Daily Gleanings about Matthew Bates’s “Gospel Allegiance,” which follows up on the thesis of “Salvation by Allegiance Alone.”
At the Logos Academic Blog, Tavis Bohlinger has part 4 in his interview series with Matthew Bates about Bates’s recently released Salvation by Allegiance Alone: Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus the King (Baker, 2017). Bates comments, in part,
My preference for “allegiance” springs from the conviction that the proclaimed gospel centered on Jesus the royal messiah, and this suggests that the “allegiance” portion of the range of meaning of pistis is in play in some crucial New Testament texts pertaining to salvation…. It is extremely unlikely that Paul felt that pistis was something that was ultimately in tension with or contradictory to embodied activity (i.e., good works as a general category). Paul’s complaint with works (of Law) lies elsewhere, as I explain in Ch. 5.
...
Over at the Logos Academic Blog, Tavis
Bohlinger now has up the
second part of his interview with Matthew Bates about his Salvation
by Allegiance Alone: Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus
the King (Baker, 2017). Â This interview portion focuses much
more on Bates’s particular proposal in the volume.
For previous related discussion, see Other discussion of Bates, “Salvation by allegiance,” Bates interview at theLAB, and Bates, “Salvation by allegiance alone” and some theological forebears.
...