<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Legislation on J. David Stark</title>
    <link>https://jdavidstark.com/tags/legislation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Legislation on J. David Stark</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.162.1</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>J. David Stark</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://jdavidstark.com/tags/legislation/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Circumcision (Clearly) Uncircumscribed in Germany</title>
      <link>https://jdavidstark.com/circumcision-clearly-uncircumscribed-in-germany/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
       <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ntinterpretation.wordpress.com/?p=12079</guid> 
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a
href=&#34;http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/2012_12_09_archive.html#5810536740866254383&#34;&gt;Jim
Davila&lt;/a&gt; notes a report of a new German bill that explicitly permits
the continued practice of infant male circumcision on religious grounds.
The legality of the practice in Germany had been thrown into question by
a related &lt;a
href=&#34;https://jdavidstark.com/cologne-court-circumscribes-circumcision/&#34;&gt;decision
by the Cologne court&lt;/a&gt; earlier this year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&#34;kitForm&#34;&gt;&lt;script async data-uid=&#34;f01af45458&#34; src=&#34;https://jdavidstark.kit.com/f01af45458/index.js&#34;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
