Texas Christian University’s open,
online thesis repository contains John
Burkett’s treatment of Book III of Aristotle’s Retoric. The
project is a commentary-style work on that book that strives to complete
the project that William Grimaldi began with Books I and II. According to the abstract,
This new commentary on Aristotle’s Rhetoric III serves the purpose
which the text held at the Classical Lyceum: elucidating Aristotle’s
theory of style (lexis) and arrangement (taxis) for scholars, teachers,
and practitioners of rhetoric. This commentary provides a much needed
update because the last commentary, written by Cambridge classicist E.
M. Cope in 1877, is now understood as a misinterpretation that reads
Aristotle Platonically, takes seriously only rational appeals, assumes a
mimetic theory of language that depreciates style, and misdefines
central concepts like the enthymeme and common topics. Providing a new
interpretation, this commentary may be summarized by three adjectives:
Grimaldian, rhetorical, and accessible. First, this Grimaldian
commentary applies the new rhetoric philosophy of William M. A.
Grimaldi, S.J., which he explicates in Studies in the Philosophy of
Aristotle’s Rhetoric (1972) and in his two-volume Commentary
(1980-1988), wherein Grimaldi develops an integrated and contextual
interpretation of the Rhetoric. Second, this rhetorical commentary
observes the rhetoric in the Rhetoric since Aristotle typically
practices what he teaches: writing with enthymemes, defining by
metaphor, clarifying by antithesis, and arranging units by thesis,
analysis, and synthesis. This commentary observes how Aristotle applies
his three rhetorical appeals (ĂŞthos, pathos, logos), his theories of
propriety (prepon), exotic (xenos), and virtue (aretĂŞ) in style, and the
systems of Greek imagery, all of which develop a unified and interactive
theory of invention, style, and arrangement. Attention is given to
Aristotle’s creative theory of metaphor, being a tropos (turn) and a
topos (place) of invention, functioning as a stylistic syllogism for
creating knowledge with quick, pleasant learning. Arrangement also
functions creatively with localized topical procedures for responding to
the particular needs of each part of a composition. Third, this
accessible commentary features text, translation, comments, and glossary
for readers who may not be familiar with Aristotle’s idiom but who have
an interest in his rhetorical theory and technical terms. Finally,
incorporating recent scholarship, this commentary provides insights from
classical rhetoric and new rhetoric, showing their interrelationship and
how contemporary research in rhetoric builds on and helps to elucidate
Aristotle’s expansive rhetoric as a general theory of language.
...