Tag: History of Interpretation
Christian Weisse
See Kümmel 149–51. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series. In this post:
Christian Wilke
See Baird 305; Kümmel 148–49. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
Karl Lachmann
See Kümmel 146–48. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series. In this post:
Solutions to the Synoptic Problem 5: Johann Herder
Herder thought that Mark most exactly reproduced UrevOr. Matthew reproduced it with expansions, and Luke, aware of these expansions, “wished to create ‘an actual historical account’ after a wholly Hellenistic pattern.” Herder also hypothesized that “[s]ome forty years later John . . . wrote an ‘echo of the earlier Gospels at a higher pitch’ which…
Johann Eichhorn
Eichhorn does not appear to have named Q as such, but this part of his hypothesis fits what has come to be called Q. See Kümmel 77–79. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series. In this post:
Gotthold Lessing
See Kümmel 76. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series. In this post: